Key result
CMR-derived GLS adds no incremental prognostic value beyond LVEF and LGE in aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
Recent data suggested global longitudinal strain (GLS) could aid risk stratification in severe aortic stenosis, prompting investigation into its prognostic and incremental value over LVEF and LGE.
Does CMR-derived global longitudinal strain provide incremental prognostic value over LVEF and LGE for mortality in patients with aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=194)
No
Does CMR-derived global longitudinal strain provide incremental prognostic value over LVEF and LGE for mortality in patients with aortic stenosis?
CMR-derived global longitudinal strain does not provide incremental prognostic value over LVEF and late gadolinium enhancement for predicting mortality in patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GLS should not yet inform risk stratification in moderate-severe AS; leaves open its value in prospective cohorts or for non-mortality endpoints.
BACKGROUND: Recent data have suggested that global longitudinal strain (GLS) could be useful for risk stratification of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic role of GLS in patients with AS and also its incremental value in relation to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). METHODS: We analysed all consecutive patients with AS and LGE-CMR in our institution. Survival data were obtained from office of national statistics, a national body where all deaths in England are registered by law. Death certificates were obtained from the general register office. RESULTS: Some 194 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis were investigated with CMR at baseline and followed up for 7.3 ± 4 years. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, only increasing age remained significant for both all-cause and cardiac mortality, while LGE (any pattern) retained significance for all-cause mortality and had a trend to significance for cardiac mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients in the best and middle GLS tertiles had significantly better mortality compared to patients in the worst GLS tertiles. Importantly though, sequential Cox proportional-hazard analysis demonstrated that GLS did not have significant incremental prognostic value for all-cause mortality or cardiac mortality in addition to LVEF and LGE. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has demonstrated that age and LGE but not GLS are significant poor prognostic indicators in patients with moderate and severe AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsampasian et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=194). CMR-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) was evaluated on All-cause and cardiac mortality. CMR-derived global longitudinal strain did not have significant incremental prognostic value for all-cause or cardiac mortality in addition to LVEF and LGE in patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: