Key result
CF-LVAD implantation fails to improve cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity in advanced HFrEF.
Why the study?
Continuous-flow LVADs predispose to side effects such as uncontrolled blood pressure due to the lack of a physiological pulse, but little data exist regarding their impact on blood pressure regulation.
Does CF-LVAD implantation improve cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity and blood pressure regulation in patients with advanced HFrEF?
Cohort (n=12)
No
Does CF-LVAD implantation improve cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity and blood pressure regulation in patients with advanced HFrEF?
Effect estimate: 0.35 vs 0.50 ms/mmHg
Absolute Event Rate: 0.35% vs 0.5%
p-value: p=0.53
CF-LVADs do not restore normal cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity, which may contribute to adverse events like stroke and persistent functional limitations.
Persistent baroreceptor impairment after CF-LVAD may sustain clinical risks; leaves open whether device or adjunctive strategies can restore autonomic regulation in advanced HFrEF.
Background: Continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). However, the lack of a physiological pulse predisposes to side-effects including uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), and there are little data regarding the impact of CF-LVADs on BP regulation. Methods: Twelve patients (10 males, 60±11 years) with advanced heart failure completed hemodynamic assessment 2.7±4.1 months before, and 4.3±1.3 months following CF-LVAD implantation. Heart rate and systolic BP via arterial catheterization were monitored during Valsalva maneuver, spontaneous breathing, and a 0.05 Hz repetitive squat-stand maneuver to characterize cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity. Plasma norepinephrine levels were assessed during head-up tilt at supine, 30 o and 60 o . Heart rate and BP were monitored during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Results: Cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity, determined by Valsalva as well as Fourier transformation and transfer function gain of Heart rate and systolic BP during spontaneous breathing and squat-stand maneuver, was impaired before and following LVAD implantation. Norepinephrine levels were markedly elevated pre-LVAD and improved—but remained elevated post-LVAD (supine norepinephrine pre-LVAD versus post-LVAD: 654±437 versus 323±164 pg/mL). BP increased during cardiopulmonary exercise testing post-LVAD, but the magnitude of change was modest and comparable to the changes observed during the pre-LVAD cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Conclusions: Among patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, CF-LVAD implantation is associated with modest improvements in autonomic tone, but persistent reductions in cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity. Exercise-induced increases in BP are blunted. These findings shed new light on mechanisms for adverse events such as stroke, and persistent reductions in functional capacity, among patients supported by CF-LVADs. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03078972.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sailer et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=12). Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation vs. Pre-LVAD baseline was evaluated on Cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (transfer function gain of RRI and SBP at 0.05Hz) (0.35 vs 0.50 ms/mmHg, p=0.53). CF-LVAD implantation in patients with advanced HFrEF was associated with modest improvements in autonomic tone but persistent reductions in cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (gain 0.35 vs 0.50 ms/mmHg, p=0.53).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: