Key result
High social deprivation linked to ~13% higher in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
Does high social deprivation increase in-hospital mortality and reduce midterm survival in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=240,221)
Yes
Does high social deprivation increase in-hospital mortality and reduce midterm survival in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Social deprivation is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes following cardiac surgery, highlighting the need to account for socioeconomic status in risk prediction models and healthcare resource allocation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant inclusion in cardiac surgery risk models; leaves open effects of targeted interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Social deprivation impacts on healthcare outcomes but is not included in the majority of cardiac surgery risk prediction models. The objective was to investigate geographical variations in social deprivation of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and identify whether social deprivation is an independent predictor of outcomes. METHODS: National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit data for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or valve surgery performed in England between April 2003 and March 2013, were analysed. Base hospitals in England were divided into geographical regions. Social deprivation was measured by quintile groups of the index of multiple deprivation (IMD) score with the first quintile group (Q1) being the least, and the last quintile group (Q5) the most deprived group. In-hospital mortality and midterm survival were analysed using mixed effects logistic, and stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models respectively. RESULTS: 240,221 operations were analysed. There was substantial regional variation in social deprivation with the proportion of patients in IMD Q5 ranging from 34.5% in the North East to 6.5% in the East of England. Following adjustment for preoperative risk factors, patients undergoing all cardiac surgery in IMD Q5 were found to have an increased risk of in-hospital mortality relative to IMD Q1 (OR=1.13; 95%CI 1.03 to 1.24), as were patients undergoing isolated CABG (OR=1.19; 95%CI 1.03 to 1.37). For midterm survival, patients in IMD Q5 had an increased hazard in all groups (HRs ranged between 1.10 (valve+CABG) and 1.26 (isolated CABG)). For isolated CABG, the median postoperative length of stay was 6 and 7 days, respectively, for IMD Q1-Q4 and Q5. CONCLUSIONS: Significant regional variation exists in the social deprivation of patients undergoing cardiac surgery in England. Social deprivation is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and reduced midterm survival. These findings have implications for health service provision, risk prediction models and analyses of surgical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barnard et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing elective or urgent CABG or valve surgery (n=240,221). High social deprivation (IMD Q5) vs. Low social deprivation (IMD Q1) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24, p=<0.05). High social deprivation (IMD Q5) was associated with a significantly increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.13) and reduced midterm survival compared to the least deprived group (IMD Q1) following cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: