Key result
The Checkme cuffless blood pressure monitor demonstrated high intrauser correlation for duplicate systolic blood pressure measurements (R=0.86) and strong correlation with mean home monitor readings over 3 weeks (R=0.75).
Why the study?
Frequent home BP measurements better estimate true BP, but traditional cuff-based measurements are troublesome for patients.
Is a cuffless blood pressure device feasible, reproducible, and user-friendly for ambulatory systolic blood pressure measurement in patients with hypertension?
Population
11 patients with hypertension
Comparison
Cuffless device (Checkme monitor) vs classic home BP monitor
Design
Mixed methods feasibility study
Follow-up
3 weeks
Authors
Loading...
May support reproducible home BP monitoring in hypertension; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized validation before practice change.
Observational (n=11)
No
Is a cuffless blood pressure device feasible, reproducible, and user-friendly for ambulatory systolic blood pressure measurement in patients with hypertension?
Effect estimate: R=0.86
p-value: p=<0.001
A cuffless blood pressure device demonstrated good intrauser reproducibility and high user-friendliness, suggesting it is a feasible alternative for frequent home blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients.
Ogink et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=11). Checkme Pro Health Monitor vs. Conventional home blood pressure monitor was evaluated on Intrauser correlation of duplicate systolic blood pressure measurements (R=0.86, p=<0.001). The Checkme cuffless blood pressure monitor demonstrated high intrauser correlation for duplicate systolic blood pressure measurements (R=0.86) and strong correlation with mean home monitor readings over 3 weeks (R=0.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: