Key result
COER-verapamil significantly reduced 24-h BP compared with placebo (P<0.001), with greater systolic reductions in women vs men (-15.1 vs -10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and older vs younger patients.
Why the study?
Does COER-verapamil reduce ambulatory blood pressure differently based on gender and age in patients with essential hypertension?
Meta-Analysis (n=398)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does COER-verapamil reduce ambulatory blood pressure differently based on gender and age in patients with essential hypertension?
p-value: p=<.001
The antihypertensive effect of COER-verapamil is significantly greater in women than in men, and in older patients compared with younger patients.
Supports sex- and age-specific COER-verapamil use for hypertension; extends meta-analytic evidence on differential ambulatory BP responses.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess potential differences in the 24-h antihypertensive response to treatment with the controlled-onset, extended-release (COER) calcium antagonist, verapamil in men versus women and older versus younger patients with hypertension. METHODS: Meta-analyses were performed of three prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with COER-verapamil in patients with mid-stage I to stage III essential hypertension. The trials were conducted at medical clinics in the US and Canada in patients with a mean office diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 95 to 115 mm Hg on 2 consecutive weeks and a mean daytime diastolic BP >90 mm Hg. Patients were randomized to treatment with 180 to 540 mg/day of COER-verapamil (N = 273) or placebo (N = 125). Changes from baseline in ambulatory BP and heart rate after COER-verapamil were compared in men versus women and in older versus younger patients. RESULTS: Treatment with COER-verapamil caused significant reductions in 24-h and early-morning systolic and diastolic BP in all of the subpopulations as compared with placebo (P < .001). COER-verapamil induced a greater reduction in both 24-h systolic (-15.1 v -10.0 mm Hg; P < .001) and diastolic (-10.4 v -8.2 mm Hg; P = .003) BP in women compared with men. Older patients showed a greater mean reduction in 24-h diastolic BP (-10.2 v -8.2 mm Hg; P < .05) and heart rate (-5.7 v -4.4 beats/min; P < .05) compared with younger patients. Side effects were similar in all of the COER-verapamil treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both gender and age were significant determinants of the response to COER-verapamil. The antihypertensive effect of verapamil is greater in women than in men and in older patients compared with younger patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William B. White (2001) conducted a meta-analysis in Essential hypertension (n=398). COER-verapamil vs. Placebo was evaluated on Changes from baseline in 24-h ambulatory BP and heart rate (p=<.001). COER-verapamil significantly reduced 24-h BP compared with placebo (P<0.001), with greater systolic reductions in women vs men (-15.1 vs -10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and older vs younger patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: