Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• Autoencoder-predictor model that forecasts end-of-life pathways from material compositions. • Additional input features include circular origin and dismantlability potential. • Findings show strong model robustness and semantic material learning. • Identifies key material enablers of circularity in construction. • Enables material traceability and provides probabilistic guidance aiding decision-making. Construction and demolition activities are a major source of industrial waste, yet material end-of-life circularity and traceability remain poorly understood. This study addresses the challenge of forecasting end-of-life pathways from building material compositions by introducing a hybrid autoencoder–predictor model. The approach encodes material profiles into continuous embeddings and considers additional design parameters to predict probable end-of-life scenarios. Trained on 8,680 environmental product declaration-derived samples, the model achieved a mean error of 0.01%, MAE of 3.3%, RMSE of 6.2%, and R² = 0.82. Results identify key materials that enable recycling and highlight the importance of design-for-disassembly and recycled content in guiding end-of-life decisions. Besides, findings also reveal that end-of-life reporting practices are somewhat inconsistent, especially for reuse, filling, reconditioning, and composting, highlighting opportunities for policy and reporting standard enhancements. By enabling probabilistic forecasting of end-of-life outcomes, this tool supports transparent material traceability and informs procurement, policy development, and sustainable design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vergés et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: