Key result
A maintenance dose infusion of eptifibatide in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI did not significantly reduce three-month MACE (28.6% vs 35.0%; P=0.286).
Why the study?
The study investigated the effect of a maintenance dose of eptifibatide in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI.
Does a maintenance dose of intravenous eptifibatide reduce three-month MACE in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI?
RCT (n=264)
Randomly divided
Does a maintenance dose of intravenous eptifibatide reduce three-month MACE in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.6% vs 35%
p-value: p=0.286
A maintenance infusion of eptifibatide after PPCI for STEMI does not significantly reduce 3-month MACE, but may reduce re-hospitalization and re-infarction without increasing bleeding risk.
Does not support routine maintenance eptifibatide after STEMI PPCI; challenges adjunctive GPIIb/IIIa infusion for ischemic outcomes.
Aim: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is usually caused by a rupture in the atherosclerotic plaque, followed by platelet aggregation which ultimately leads to acute coronary artery occlusion. In this study, we investigated the effect of maintenance dose of Eptifibatide (intravenous drug of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor) in patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: 264 patients who had acute chest pain suggestive of STEMI were entered in the study. All patients received the same dose of bolus dose of eptifibatide. Then the patients were randomly divided into two groups, one group (n=147) received a maintenance dose of intravenous eptifibatide (infusion of 2g/kg/min) and the other group (n=117) did not receive this treatment. All patients were evaluated 1 and 3 months after the start of treatment in terms of predicted outcomes. Results: The occurrence of three-month MACE between the case and control groups did not have a statistically significant difference (28.6% versus 35.0% ; P-value: 0.286). Re-hospitalization occurred in 10 patients (6.8%) from the case group and 30 patients (25.6%) from the control group, which was statistically significant (P-value: 0.000). Also, investigations showed that the rate of re-infarction (P-value: 0.024) and target lesion revascularization (P-value: 0.003) was significantly lower in the group that received Eptifibatide infusion. Conclusion: Eptifibatide maintenance dose infusion in patients who undergo PPCI in the context of STEMI, does not significantly reduce MACE, although it does significantly reduce re-hospitalization and re-infarction. It also does not increase the risk of bleeding and cerebrovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalalian et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (n=264). Eptifibatide maintenance dose vs. No maintenance dose was evaluated on Three-month MACE (p=0.286). A maintenance dose infusion of eptifibatide in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI did not significantly reduce three-month MACE (28.6% vs 35.0%; P=0.286).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: