Key result
PROMIS-Plus-HF profile demonstrates strong psychometric reliability with test-retest ICCs ≥0.90 in heart failure.
Why the study?
Bringing together generic and HF-specific items in a publicly available patient-reported outcome measure may facilitate routine health status assessment for clinical care, shared decision-making, quality assessment, intervention evaluation, and comparative research.
Is the PROMIS-Plus-HF profile measure a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure for patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=675)
Yes
Is the PROMIS-Plus-HF profile measure a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure for patients with heart failure?
The PROMIS-Plus-HF profile measure provides a reliable and valid comprehensive assessment of physical, mental, and social health for patients with heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support PROMIS-Plus-HF for HF PRO assessment; leaves open need for randomized validation before routine use.
Background Bringing together generic and heart failure (HF)-specific items in a publicly available, patient-reported outcome measure may facilitate routine health status assessment for improving clinical care and shared decision-making, assessing quality of care, evaluating new interventions, and comparing groups with different conditions. Methods and Results We performed a mixed-methods study to develop and validate the PROMIS®-Plus-HF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®-Plus-Heart Failure) profile measure-a HF-specific instrument based on the generic PROMIS. We conducted 8 focus groups with 61 patients with HF and phone interviews with 10 HF clinicians. The measure was developed via an iterative process of reviewing existing PROMIS items and developing and testing new HF items. In a 600-patient sample, we estimated reliability (internal consistency; test-retest, with n=100 participants). We conducted validity analyses using Pearson r and Spearman ρ correlations with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire subscores. In a longitudinal sample, we performed responsiveness testing (paired t tests) with 75 patients with HF receiving interventions with expected health status improvement. The PROMIS-Plus-HF measure comprises 86 items (64 existing; 22 new) across 18 domains. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach α) coefficients ranged from 0.52 to 0.96, with α≥0.70 in 12 of 17 domains. Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients were ≥0.90. Correlations with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire subscores supported expected convergent ( r/ρ>0.60) and divergent validity ( r/ρ<0.30). In the longitudinal sample, 10 of 18 domains had improved ( P<0.05) scores from baseline to follow-up. Conclusions The PROMIS-Plus-HF profile measure-a complete assessment of physical, mental, and social health-exhibited good psychometric characteristics and may facilitate patient-centered care and research. Subsets of domains and items can be used depending on the clinical or research purpose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=675). PROMIS-Plus-HF profile measure was evaluated on Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach α) and test-retest reliability (Cronbach α 0.52-0.96). The PROMIS-Plus-HF profile measure exhibited good psychometric characteristics, with internal consistency reliability coefficients ranging from 0.52 to 0.96 and test-retest ICCs ≥0.90.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: