PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Journal of Hypertension0 citations

Stratification of Hypertensive Patients According to Risk Score – Contribution to Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation?

View Full Paper
SFSlavomíra FilipováDSDana SkultetyovaĽGĽudovít Gašpar

Key Result

Abnormal late atrial potentials were significantly more frequent in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (86.9%) compared to those without (69.9%; P<0.001), informing a 14-point risk score.

Key Points

  • Assess the risk of developing atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients considering various clinical parameters.
  • Longitudinal study of 284 hypertensive patients with varying cardiovascular risk factors and disease duration.
  • Patients were followed in groups based on AF status: preserved LV function, documented pAF, and post-ablation.
  • Evaluated non-ECG and ECG parameters for risk stratification and developed a scoring system based on the findings.
  • Significant differences in ECG parameters (LVPs and LAPs) among groups, affecting risk stratification scores.
  • Abnormal LVPs increased from 35.9% in group 1 to 81% in group 3, p<0.01; LAPs from 69.9% to 95.5%, p<0.001.
  • Developed a scoring system based on 14 parameters (7 ECG and 7 non-ECG) for assessing AF risk.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=284)

Structured PICO

Can a combined clinical and ECG scoring system stratify the risk of developing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients?

P
Population
284 hypertensive patients in sinus rhythm, including those with and without prior paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, followed longitudinally to develop a risk stratification score.
E
Exposure
14-point scoring system combining 7 non-ECG parameters (age >60, BMI >30, DM, HLP, CHD, post-CABG, non-dipper) and 7 ECG parameters (Holter, VCG, LVPs, LAPs)
O
Outcome
Risk stratification for developing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF)surrogate

A proposed 14-point scoring system incorporating clinical and advanced ECG parameters may help identify hypertensive patients at high risk for developing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 86.9% vs 69.9%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

Objective: AH patients with different disease duration and treatment with different CV risk were examined and followed longitudinally. The aim is risk stratification of patients, with regard to the developing atrial fibrillation (AF). Design and method: 284 patients (179 men, 105 women) were examined repeatedly: group 1 (n=133) with preserved LV function without paroxysmal AF, group 2 (n=130) with documented pAF, group 3 (n= 21) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for pAF/AFLA. All examined patients had sinus rhythm. NonECG data (clinical, laboratory data, echoCG, ABPM), ECG parameters (ECG, Holter ECG, VKG, high-resolution ECG, i.e. late ventricular potentials-LVPs. late atrial potentials-LAPs) were monitored. Results: Groups 1,2,3 did not differ significantly in BMI and monitored echoGG parameters. The differences between groups 1 and 2 was statistically significant in following parameters: non-dippers in ABPM, verified CHD, 3 or more combinations of drugs. In ECG parameters: abnormal LVPs and LAPs increased significantly between groups 1, 2 and 3. For LVPs: abnormal fQRSd (n, %) group 1: 61 (35.9), group 2: 71 (54.6), group 3: 17 (81.0), p60 years, (2) BMI >30, (3) DM, (4) HLP, (5) CHD, (6) post-CABG status, (7) non-dipper in ABPM. 7 ECG parameters in the score: (1) Holter ECG with ESVEA 30°, (5) abnormal fQRSd duration, (6) abnormal LVPs (3/3 or 2/3, (7) highly abnormal LAPs (abnormal nPd+abnormal fPd).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Filipová et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Arterial hypertension (n=284). Clinical and ECG risk factors vs. Patients without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Abnormal late atrial potentials (fPd) (p=<0.001). Abnormal late atrial potentials were significantly more frequent in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (86.9%) compared to those without (69.9%; P<0.001), informing a 14-point risk score.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc718dee9eb8c0dce7f46https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001195732.59132.79
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Screening of atrial fibrillation episode in patients with abnormal echocardiographic parameters2025
  2. 2Determining The Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Paroxysm in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Intact and Reduced Ejection Fraction2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Prospective multicentric validation of a novel prediction model for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation2020 · 7 citations
  4. 4Interatrial block and abnormal P-wave electrocardiographic parameters as non-invasive predictors of atrial fibrillation2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Clinical, Electrocardiographic, and Echocardiographic Parameter Combination Predicts the Onset of Atrial Fibrillation2018 · 11 citations