This work demonstrates God's non-demonstrability and the necessary existence of the first principle, suggesting vital implications for understanding reality.
This work consists of two distinct and complementary logico-mathematical demonstrations. Part One establishes that God — understood as the first ground of reality — is not demonstrable within any formal system, independently of the question of its existence. Part Two constructs a corollary to the first: it shows that the first ground exists necessarily as the ineluctable structural condition of the existence of the Universe. The two results do not contradict each other: they stand on distinct logical planes, and together they trace the contours of what cannot be reached — but cannot not be.The load-bearing structure of the demonstration is exhaustion of cases: whatever nature one attributes to God as ground — Definite Infinity or Indefinite Infinity — one arrives at the same conclusion through distinct logical paths. The method is that of analytic philosophy; the style, that of the tradition of formal rigour applied to questions of foundations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giuseppe Antonio Marino (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: