PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science0 citations

Ultrasonic drilling of ARB-processed AA6061 sheets: Experimental characterization, drill point angle investigation, and Grey Wolf Optimizer-enhanced Random Forest prediction

View Full Paper
AAAdel Ziae AzarAMAmir MostafapourMBMohammad Baraheni

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize thrust force behavior in drilling operations of ARB-processed AA6061 sheets under various conditions.
  • Conducted drilling tests on multi-layer AA6061 sheets using different drilling parameters;
  • Applied ANOVA to identify influential parameters affecting thrust force;
  • Developed a Random Forest model and optimized using Grey Wolf Optimizer.
  • Achieved maximum thrust force reduction to 211.6 N using ultrasonic drilling with optimized parameters;
  • Feed rate was the most influential parameter with p < 0.0001;
  • Random Forest model showed R² values > 0.98 in training, indicating strong predictive capability.

Abstract

This study examines thrust force behavior in conventional drilling (CD) and ultrasonic-assisted drilling (UD) of multi-layer AA6061 aluminum sheets fabricated via accumulative roll bonding (ARB), integrating statistical design of experiments, machine learning prediction, and meta-heuristic optimization. Drilling tests were conducted on 3–12 layer configurations using three point angles (118°, 130°, 140°), three feed rates (0.08, 0.15, 0.25 mm/rev), and three spindle speeds (500, 1000, 1500 rpm) under both CD and UD conditions. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) identified feed rate ( p 0.98 in training and >0.92 in testing, with mean absolute percentage errors below 8%; feature importance ranked feed rate highest (∼42%), followed by point angle, number of layers, and spindle speed. Optimization via the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) yielded minimum thrust forces of 252.62 N for CD and 211.6 N for UD at the combination of 140° point angle, 0.08 mm/rev feed, 1500 rpm, and 12 layers, achieving desirability = 1.000. Results underline the effectiveness of coupling DOE analysis with RF prediction and GWO optimization to capture process–geometry–material interactions, and demonstrate that UD combined with optimal tool geometry enables significant thrust force reduction in ARB-processed aluminum, offering actionable strategies for low-force machining.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Azar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc76ddee9eb8c0dce84d5https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062261440654
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper