RT-PCR analysis of specimens from gastroenteritis outbreaks traced to shellfish revealed the coexistence of two distinct Norwalk-like virus genotypes within single stool and oyster specimens.
Observational (n=25)
The study provides direct molecular evidence linking oysters to Norwalk-like virus gastroenteritis outbreaks and demonstrates the coexistence of two viral genotypes within single clinical and environmental specimens.
We determined the nucleotide sequences of Norwalk-like viruses in 10 PCR products from stool or oyster specimens obtained from four outbreaks of gastroenteritis in which shellfish was suspected as the cause in Shizuoka prefecture in Japan between 1987-94. The sequences were determined from nucleotide positions 4561-4852 (292 bp) in the polymerase region. Two types of sequences were detected. One (genotype 1) had 87% sequence homology with the prototype Norwalk virus, and the other (genotype 2) had 59% sequence homology. The sequences from isolates belonging to the same genotype were almost the same regardless of the year of isolation. Because sequences of 2 genotypes were detected in 2 of the 4 outbreaks, nested PCR was performed with genotype-specific primers to detect the presence of 2 genotypes in the same specimen. In 5 of 10 specimens, PCR bands were detected with both genotype-specific primers, indicating the coexistence of 2 genotypes in 1 specimen. We also detected two genotypes of Norwalk-like virus in an oyster from a sample implicated in one of the outbreaks which may provide direct evidence of oysters as the cause of the gastroenteritis.
Sugieda et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Acute non-bacterial gastroenteritis (n=25). Norwalk-like virus exposure from shellfish was evaluated on Detection and genotyping of Norwalk-like virus sequences. RT-PCR analysis of specimens from gastroenteritis outbreaks traced to shellfish revealed the coexistence of two distinct Norwalk-like virus genotypes within single stool and oyster specimens.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: