Key result
Metabolic signatures show promise as non-invasive biomarkers and novel treatment targets in post-MI HF.
Why the study?
Post-myocardial infarction heart failure has a high incidence and poor prognosis, making accurate identification of high-risk individuals crucial for implementing preventive strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metabolic profiling provides insights into the pathophysiology of post-MI heart failure and highlights potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent long-term complication of myocardial infarction (MI). The incidence of post-MI HF is high, and patients with the condition have a poor prognosis. Accurate identification of individuals at high risk for post-MI HF is crucial for implementation of a protective and ideally personalized strategy to prevent fatal events. Post-MI HF is characterized by adverse cardiac remodeling, which results from metabolic changes in response to long-term ischemia. Moreover, various risk factors, including genetics, diet, and obesity, can influence metabolic pathways in patients. This review focuses on the metabolic signatures of post-MI HF that could serve as non-invasive biomarkers for early identification in high-risk populations. We also explore how metabolism participates in the pathophysiology of post-MI HF. Furthermore, we discuss the potential of metabolites as novel targets for treatment of post-MI HF and as biomarkers for prognostic evaluation. It is expected to provide valuable suggestions for the clinical prevention and treatment of post-MI HF from a metabolic perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2023) conducted a review in Post-myocardial infarction heart failure. Metabolic signatures was evaluated. Metabolic signatures in post-myocardial infarction heart failure have the potential to serve as non-invasive biomarkers for early identification, prognostic evaluation, and novel treatment targets.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: