Why the study?
Is the NT-proANP EIA a robust and reproducible assay for measuring NT-proANP as a biomarker of cardiac hypertrophy in male rats?
Is the NT-proANP EIA a robust and reproducible assay for measuring NT-proANP as a biomarker of cardiac hypertrophy in male rats?
The NT-proANP EIA is a robust and reproducible assay, making NT-proANP an excellent candidate biomarker for detecting drug-induced cardiac hypertrophy in preclinical toxicology investigations.
In the clinical setting, natriuretic peptides (NPs) have proven to be reliable noninvasive markers for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic monitoring of heart failure. Given their proven utility in humans, NPs are potential candidates for translational biomarkers during drug development to detect drug-induced hemodynamic stress resulting in cardiac hypertrophy in preclinical species. We evaluated the intra-and interassay precision and the stability of serum N-terminal-proatrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proANP) using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA). We then measured NT-proANP concentrations in 532 serum samples from 337 male Crl:CD(SD) rats with or without pressure-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Additionally, we established a reference range using samples from control animals across multiple studies. The data demonstrate that the NT-proANP EIA is a robust and reproducible assay for the measurement of NT-proANP. The noninvasive translational utility, minimal sample volume requirement, and the lack of existing hypertrophic biomarkers in the male rat make NT-proANP an excellent candidate for further interrogation as a biomarker of cardiac hypertrophy in preclinical toxicology investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colton et al. (2011) studied Cardiac hypertrophy (n=337). NT-proANP EIA assay was evaluated on Intra-and interassay precision and stability of serum NT-proANP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: