Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article discusses the dual interpretation of the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox associated with Bayesian posterior probabilities and Bayes factors, both as a differentiation between frequentist and Bayesian statistics and as a pointer to the difficulty of using improper priors while testing. I stress the considerable impact of this paradox on the foundations of both classical and Bayesian statistics. While assessing existing resolutions of the paradox, I focus on a critical viewpoint of the paradox discussed by Spanos in Philosophy of Science .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christian P. Robert (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: