Among 1001 patients undergoing CTPA for suspected pulmonary embolism, PE was diagnosed in 22.2%, and 16.8% of scans could theoretically be avoided due to underuse of risk-stratification tools.
Observational (n=1,001)
No
How adherent are emergency department clinicians to guideline-recommended risk-stratification tools when ordering CTPA for suspected pulmonary embolism?
There is scant utilization of guideline-recommended risk-stratification tools and D-dimer testing in the emergency department, leading to a significant proportion of potentially avoidable CTPA scans for suspected pulmonary embolism.
AIMS: The use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) has considerably increased due developing technology and better availability of imaging. The underuse of pre-test probability scores and overuse of CTPA has been previously reported. We sought to investigate the indications for CTPA at a University Hospital emergency clinic and seek for factors eliciting the potential overuse of CTPA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Altogether 1001 patients were retrospectively collected and analysed from the medical records using a structured case report form. PE was diagnosed in 222/1001 (22.2%) of patients. Patients with PE had more often prior PE/deep vein thrombosis, bleeding/thrombotic diathesis and less often asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, or decompensated heart failure. Patients were divided into three groups based on Wells PE risk-stratification score and two groups based on the revised Geneva score. A total of 9/382 (2.4%), 166/527 (31.5%), and 47/92 (52.2%) patients had PE in the CTPA in the low, intermediate, and high pre-test likelihood groups according to Wells score, and 200/955 (20.9%) and 22/46 (47.8%) patients had PE in the CTPA in the low-intermediate and the high pre-test likelihood groups according to the revised Geneva score, respectively. D-dimer was only measured from 568/909 (62.5%) and 597/955 (62.5%) patients who were either in the low or the intermediate-risk group according to Wells score and the revised Geneva score. Noteworthy, 105/1001 (10.5%) and 107/1001 (10.7%) of the CTPAs were inappropriately ordered according to the Wells score and the revised Geneva score. Altogether 168/1001 (16.8%) could theoretically be avoided. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights scant utilization of guideline-recommended risk-stratification tools in CTPA use at the emergency department.
Kauppi et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in suspected pulmonary embolism (n=1,001). Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was evaluated on Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Among 1001 patients undergoing CTPA for suspected pulmonary embolism, PE was diagnosed in 22.2%, and 16.8% of scans could theoretically be avoided due to underuse of risk-stratification tools.