Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OVERVIEW:There is a real shortage of breakthrough initiatives in businesses' development portfolios. A major challenge in developing these high-risk projects is portfolio management—how executives make R&D investment decisions. Financial approaches, such as net present value and the productivity index, are traditionally recommended to lend rigor to go/kill decisions. An overreliance on financial tools favors incremental projects whose financial forecasts are reliable, however, producing an abundance of small, low-hanging-fruit projects and a failure to allocate resources to strategic projects. Different toolsets must be used to assess high-risk breakthrough initiatives, including strategic buckets, expected commercial value, and spiral development processes. All of these must be supported by a climate and culture that provide the appetite to take on risky projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert G. Cooper (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: