Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• Biomass chamber reached 1140 °C, ensuring optimal brick firing temperature. • Achieved high combustion efficiency of 97 % at λ = 1.8 with dry biomass fuel. • Emissions of CO, NOₓ, SO₂, and PM₂.₅ met strict international standards. • Heat transfer peaked at 270 W/m²·K; heat flux reached 320 kW/m². • Tailored design for small-scale kilns offers eco-friendly fuel alternative. The brick manufacturing industry is one of the most energy-intensive sectors and a significant contributor to air pollution, primarily due to its reliance on coal and diesel fuels. This study examines the thermal performance and flue gas emissions of a biomass combustion chamber, specifically designed for small-scale brick production, to address this environmental challenge. The objective is to evaluate combustion efficiency, heat distribution, and pollutant emissions while comparing the system's performance with conventional coal-based systems. The combustion chamber was experimentally tested using real-time data acquisition systems to monitor temperature profiles, heat flux, and emissions of CO, CO₂, NOₓ, SO₂, and particulate matter (PM₂.₅). Results showed that the chamber achieved a peak temperature of 1140 °C, a maximum heat transfer coefficient of 270 W/m²·K, and a heat flux of 320 kW/m². The optimal combustion efficiency reached 97 % at an air-fuel ratio (λ) of 1.8 with biomass moisture content below 10 %. Emission measurements revealed significantly lower values compared to conventional systems, with CO at 85 mg/m³, NOₓ at 45 mg/m³, SO₂ at 8 mg/m³, and PM₂.₅ at 25 mg/m³. These findings demonstrate the system’s compliance with international environmental standards. The novelty of this work lies in its integrated design approach, tailored for small-scale brick kilns, which combines optimised geometry, air staging, and thermal analysis. In conclusion, the study confirms that biomass-based combustion chambers offer a technically viable and environmentally sustainable alternative to fossil-fueled systems in the brick manufacturing sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iqbal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: