Key result
Obstructive sleep apnoea plays an important role in inflammation and atherosclerosis, while CPAP treatment improves heart function, blood pressure, and total cholesterol.
Why the study?
Does continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment improve cardiovascular risk factors in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea?
Does continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment improve cardiovascular risk factors in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea?
Severe obstructive sleep apnoea may be a coronary heart disease equivalent, and CPAP treatment can improve heart function and cardiovascular risk factors, though more long-term RCT data is needed.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent studies have provided evidence that severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) may warrant inclusion in the list of coronary heart disease (CHD) equivalents. RECENT FINDINGS: Data within the past 12 months provide insight into complex issues. Specifically, OSA was shown to play an important role in the development of inflammation and atherosclerosis, but its effects on endothelial dysfunction were equivocal. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment was linked with significant improvements in heart function, blood pressure and total cholesterol, but the effect was not always the most significant. SUMMARY: At present, caution is warranted in the interpretation of results. In the future, data from randomized controlled trials with longer duration are expected to shed more light on the relationship between CHD and OSA and on what can be expected from CPAP regarding CHD risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pafili et al. (2015) conducted a review in Obstructive sleep apnoea and coronary heart disease. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was evaluated. Obstructive sleep apnoea plays an important role in inflammation and atherosclerosis, while CPAP treatment improves heart function, blood pressure, and total cholesterol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: