A systematic review of 364 articles on neurovascular coupling found that 92.9% of studies had absent or minimal control of confounding physiological factors like blood pressure and heart rate.
Systematic Review (n=364)
Most neurovascular coupling studies fail to adequately control for confounding physiological influences like blood pressure and respiratory metrics, highlighting a need for better study designs.
In this review, we have amalgamated the literature, taking a multimodal neuroimaging approach to quantify the relationship between neuronal firing and haemodynamics during a task paradigm (i.e., neurovascular coupling response), while considering confounding physiological influences. Original research articles that used concurrent neuronal and haemodynamic quantification in humans (n ≥ 10) during a task paradigm were included from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE and PsychINFO. Articles published before 31 July 2023 were considered for eligibility. Rapid screening was completed by the first author. Two authors completed the title/abstract and full-text screening. Article quality was assessed using a modified version of the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. A total of 364 articles were included following title/abstract and full-text screening. The most common combination was EEG/functional MRI (68.7%), with cognitive (48.1%) and visual (27.5%) tasks being the most common. The majority of studies displayed an absence/minimal control of blood pressure, arterial gas concentrations and/or heart rate (92.9%), and only 1.3% monitored these factors. A minority of studies restricted or collected data pertaining to caffeine (7.4%), exercise (0.8%), food (0.5%), nicotine (2.7%), the menstrual cycle (0.3%) or cardiorespiratory fitness levels (0.5%). The cerebrovasculature is sensitive to numerous factors; thus, to understand the neurovascular coupling response fully, better control for confounding physiological influences of blood pressure and respiratory metrics is imperative during study-design formulation. Moreover, further work should continue to examine sex-based differences, the influence of sex steroid hormone concentrations and cardiorespiratory fitness.
Burma et al. (Fri,) conducted a systematic review in Neurovascular coupling (n=364). Concurrent neuronal and haemodynamic quantification was evaluated on Absence or minimal control of blood pressure, arterial gas concentrations and/or heart rate. A systematic review of 364 articles on neurovascular coupling found that 92.9% of studies had absent or minimal control of confounding physiological factors like blood pressure and heart rate.