Key result
Squat-stand maneuvers alter peak cerebral blood velocity vs rest but overall neurovascular activation remains unchanged.
Why the study?
The extent to which the neurovascular coupling response remains intact during transient hypo- and hypertensive challenges was unknown.
Does transient hypo- and hyper-tension induced by squat-stand maneuvers alter the neurovascular coupling response in healthy participants?
Does transient hypo- and hyper-tension induced by squat-stand maneuvers alter the neurovascular coupling response in healthy participants?
p-value: p=<0.045
The neurovascular coupling response remains intact during transient cyclical blood pressure challenges in healthy individuals.
Neurovascular coupling remains preserved during squat-stand BP swings in healthy adults; leaves open applicability to clinical populations.
Introduction . Neurovascular coupling (NVC) describes the coupling of neuronal metabolic demand to blood supply, which has shown to be impaired with chronic hypertension, as well as with prolonged hypotension. However, it is unknown the extent the NVC response remains intact during transient hypo- and hyper-tensive challenges. Methods . Fifteen healthy participants (9 females/6 males) completed a visual NVC task (‘ Where’s Waldo? ’) over two testing sessions, consisting of cyclical 30 s eyes closed and opened portions. The Waldo task was completed at rest (8 min) and concurrently during squat-stand maneuvers (SSMs; 5 min) at 0.05 Hz (10 s squat/stand) and 0.10 Hz (5 s squat-stand). SSMs induce 30–50 mmHg blood pressure oscillations, resulting in cyclical hypo- and hyper-tensive swings within the cerebrovasculature, allowing for the quantification of the NVC response during transient hypo- and hyper-tension. Outcome NVC metrics included baseline, peak, relative increase in cerebral blood velocity (CBv), and area-under-the-curve (AUC30) within the posterior and middle cerebral arteries indexed via transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Within-subject, between-task comparisons were conducted using analysis of variance with effect size calculations. Results . Differences were noted between rest and SSM conditions in both vessels for peak CBv (all p < 0.045) and the relative increase in CBv (all p < 0.049) with small-to-large effect sizes. AUC30 metrics were similar between all tasks (all p > 0.090) with negligible-to-small effect sizes. Conclusions . Despite the SSMs eliciting ∼30–50 mmHg blood pressure oscillations, similar levels of activation occurred within the neurovascular unit across all conditions. This demonstrated the signaling of the NVC response remained intact during cyclical blood pressure challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burma et al. (2023) studied Healthy (n=15). Squat-stand maneuvers (SSMs) vs. Rest was evaluated on Peak cerebral blood velocity (CBv), relative increase in CBv, and area-under-the-curve (AUC30) (p=<0.045). Squat-stand maneuvers altered peak and relative cerebral blood velocity compared to rest (p<0.049), but overall neurovascular activation (AUC30) remained similar across conditions (p>0.090).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: