Key result
Conversion of BNP and NT-proBNP results between Biosite, Bayer, and Roche assays using regression relationships is not reliable, though concordance using manufacturers' cutoffs was acceptable.
Why the study?
Can BNP and NT-proBNP results be reliably converted between Biosite, Bayer, and Roche assays for patient monitoring?
Observational
Can BNP and NT-proBNP results be reliably converted between Biosite, Bayer, and Roche assays for patient monitoring?
BNP and NT-proBNP results from different commercial assays cannot be reliably converted using regression equations, highlighting the need for assay-specific interpretation.
Assay-specific BNP/NT-proBNP cutoffs preferred over conversions; leaves open reliable inter-assay methods.
This study determined whether, for patient monitoring, it is feasible to convert B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) results obtained using Triage (BNP, Biosite, San Diego, CA), Centaur (BNP, Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY), and Elecsys 2010 (N-terminal proBNP; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) assays. Concordance between assays and effects of renal impairment also were assessed. Samples were primarily from emergency center patients. Biosite testing was performed immediately; Bayer and Roche testing was performed later on plasma stored frozen (-30 degrees C). Logistic regression relationships were as follows: Bayer = 0.57 Biosite + 23.1, n = 121, R2 = 0.85; Roche = 6.09 Biosite -220.4 + 1,131.6 (if female), n = 131, R2 = 0.57; and Roche = 15.34 Bayer + 2,400.8, n = 150, R2 = 0.23. An increased serum creatinine level (>/=2 mg/dL [>/=177 micromol/L]) influenced the Roche results. We conclude the following from this preliminary study: (1) Results from one method cannot be converted reliably to another using regression relationships. (2) When using manufacturers'cutoff values, concordance between assays was acceptable. (3) Renal impairment affected Roche results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sykes et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Emergency center patients requiring BNP/NT-proBNP testing. Biosite, Bayer, and Roche BNP/NT-proBNP assays vs. Cross-comparison between assays was evaluated on Feasibility of converting results between assays and concordance. Conversion of BNP and NT-proBNP results between Biosite, Bayer, and Roche assays using regression relationships is not reliable, though concordance using manufacturers' cutoffs was acceptable.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: