Key result
White thrombi were associated with a significantly higher rate of no-reflow phenomenon compared to red thrombi (17% vs 4.3%) during OCT-guided PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
Thrombus type potentially impacts PCI results such as no reflow and edge dissection, but its impact as defined by OCT required study in ACS patients.
Does OCT-identified white thrombus compared to red thrombus increase the risk of no reflow in ACS patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=100)
Does OCT-identified white thrombus compared to red thrombus increase the risk of no reflow in ACS patients undergoing PCI?
OCT-guided differentiation of thrombus type in ACS patients reveals that white thrombi are associated with a significantly higher risk of no-reflow during PCI compared to red thrombi.
Supports heightened no-reflow vigilance with white thrombi on OCT in ACS PCI; leaves open need for targeted therapies.
Thrombus is the main finding in most patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the type of which potentially impacts the end result of the interventional procedure in terms of no reflow and edge dissection. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is considered a precise intra-vascular tool to image thrombi and characterise its properties. We aimed to study the impact of thrombus type, as defined by OCT, on procedural outcome in ACS patients. In this retrospective study we enrolled 100 patients who were treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the guidance of OCT. We recorded demographic and clinical data of the whole studied cohort. Angiographic details and procedural data were noted. Baseline OCT study was performed before intervention and repeated post- intervention. Plaque characterisation was identified, and thrombi were defined as red or white thrombi. Acute angiographic outcome was defined with special emphasis on no reflow. Male patients and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients more often had white thrombi (58.1% and 71.2%, respectively). Cases with red thrombi had longer pain duration, which was statistically significant. Edge dissection was more frequent with red thrombus, 44.7% versus 32.1% with white thrombus, but the difference is not statistically significant, while 17% of patients with white thrombi were complicated by no-reflow phenomenon versus only 4.3% in patients with red thrombi, and this difference was statistically significant. In conculsion, OCT-guided PCI is feasible and safe in ACS settings. OCT- guided intra-procedural differentiation of thrombus type is potentially beneficial in predicting acute procedural outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelmonaem et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=100). White thrombus vs. Red thrombus was evaluated on No-reflow phenomenon (p=statistically significant). White thrombi were associated with a significantly higher rate of no-reflow phenomenon compared to red thrombi (17% vs 4.3%) during OCT-guided PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: