Key result
Optimal LS7 score linked to better perceptual speed and slower cognitive decline.
Why the study?
Modifiable vascular risk factors are linked to late-life cognitive impairment, but the association of Life Simple 7 metrics with cognitive decline across young-old and old-old individuals needed investigation.
Does an optimal Life Simple 7 (LS7) cardiovascular health score reduce the rate of cognitive decline in older adults?
Cohort (n=1,950)
No
Does an optimal Life Simple 7 (LS7) cardiovascular health score reduce the rate of cognitive decline in older adults?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.21 (95% CI 0.12–0.29)
Meeting ideal cardiovascular health criteria (LS7) in younger old age is associated with a slower rate of cognitive decline.
May support LS7 optimization in young-old adults; leaves open causality and effects in old-old adults.
BACKGROUND: Modifiable vascular risk factors have been associated with late-life cognitive impairment. The Life Simple 7 (LS7) score comprises seven cardiovascular health metrics: smoking, diet, physical activity, body mass index, plasma glucose, total serum cholesterol, and blood pressure. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between individual and composite LS7 metrics and rate of cognitive decline, and potential differences in these associations between young-old and old-old individuals. METHODS: This cohort study included 1,950 participants aged≥60 years (M = 70.7 years) from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care-Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), who underwent repeated neuropsychological testing (episodic and semantic memory, verbal fluency, processing speed, global cognition) across 12 years. The LS7 score was assessed at baseline and categorized as poor, intermediate, or optimal. Level and change in cognitive performance as a function of LS7 categories were estimated using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Having an optimal LS7 total score was associated with better performance (expressed in standard deviation units) at baseline for perceptual speed (β= 0.21, 95%CI 0.12-0.29), verbal fluency (β= 0.08, 0.00-0.16), and global cognition (β= 0.06, 0.00-0.12) compared to the poor group. Age-stratified analyses revealed associations for cognitive level and change only in the young-old (< 78 years) group. For the specific metrics, diverging patterns were observed for young-old and old-old individuals. CONCLUSION: Meeting the LS7 criteria for ideal cardiovascular health in younger old age is associated with slower rate of cognitive decline. However, the LS7 criteria may have a different meaning for cognitive function in very old adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Špeh et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cognitive decline (n=1,950). Life Simple 7 (LS7) score vs. Poor LS7 score was evaluated on Baseline cognitive performance (perceptual speed) (β= 0.21, 95% CI 0.12-0.29). An optimal Life Simple 7 cardiovascular health score was associated with significantly better baseline perceptual speed (β=0.21) and a slower rate of cognitive decline in young-old adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: