PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 29, 2008Annual Review of Medicine134 citations

Understanding and Reducing Variation in Surgical Mortality

View Full Paper
John D. Birkmeyer
John D. BirkmeyerDartmouth College
JDJustin B. DimickDartmouth College

Key Result

Strategies to improve surgical quality, such as selective referral, process compliance, and outcomes measurement, have distinct advantages and disadvantages depending on clinical and political contexts.

PICO

P
Population
Surgical mortality

Abstract

Surgical mortality varies widely across hospitals and surgeons, more so than would be predicted by chance alone or differences in case mix. Although a large body of research has suggested the importance of procedure volume, clinical mechanisms underlying variation in surgical mortality remain largely unknown. Payers, policy makers, and professional organizations have implemented a variety of large-scale strategies aimed at improving outcomes. Selective referral, process compliance, and outcomes measurement reflect different philosophies on how best to improve surgical quality and have distinct advantages and disadvantages. The optimal strategy may depend on both the clinical context (e.g., which procedure) and political realities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Birkmeyer et al. (2008) conducted a review in Surgical mortality. Strategies to improve surgical quality, such as selective referral, process compliance, and outcomes measurement, have distinct advantages and disadvantages depending on clinical and political contexts.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fefde1517a826fb04b65ahttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.60.062107.101214
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper