Key result
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity correlated positively with coronary artery calcification score (median 16.8 m/s for CAC >400 HU vs 13.8 m/s for CAC <10 HU; P=0.003), unlike other measurement sites.
Why the study?
Does carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity correlate better with markers of atherosclerosis than measurements at other sites in men?
Cross-Sectional (n=159)
Does carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity correlate better with markers of atherosclerosis than measurements at other sites in men?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.8% vs 13.8%
p-value: p=0.003
Carotid-femoral PWV is a better indicator of atherosclerosis than carotid-radial or femoral-posterior tibial PWV, supporting its preferential use in clinical risk stratification.
Carotid-femoral PWV may correlate more strongly with CAC than other sites in men; hypothesis-generating for preferential use in risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) predicts mortality from cardiovascular disease, ischaemic heart disease and stroke. However, a comparison of associations between PWV measured at different sites and atherosclerosis in coronary, carotid and femoral arteries has not been made. METHODS: In 159 men (ages 45-82 years) with and without known coronary artery disease, PWV measurements were made between carotid-femoral, carotid-radial and femoral-posterior tibial sites, using an ultrasound technique. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) scores were measured by multislice computed tomography. Carotid and femoral intima-media thickness (IMT) and presence of plaque were determined by ultrasound. Known coronary artery disease was confirmed by angiography. Participants were grouped into four categories of CAC score: 0-10, 11-100, 101-400, > 400 Hounsfield Units (HU). Measurements of blood pressure, heart rate and fasting bloods were made in all individuals. RESULTS: Carotid-femoral PWV correlated positively with CAC score and increased with incremental coronary calcification category (median carotid-femoral PWV 16.8 m/s in those with CAC score > 400 HU and 13.8 m/s in those with CAC score < 10 HU; P = 0.003). Carotid-femoral PWV also correlated with carotid and femoral IMT (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively) and with carotid and femoral plaque (P = 0.001, P = 0.038, respectively). Increased carotid-femoral PWV also correlated with increasing age (P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001), mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure (P < 0.001). Carotid-radial and femoral-posterior tibial PWV were not significantly associated with CAC score, carotid or femoral IMT or carotid plaque. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid-femoral PWV is a better indicator of atherosclerosis than either carotid-radial or femoral-posterior tibial PWV, and should be used preferentially in studies of atherosclerosis and in stratifying risk in clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tillin et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Atherosclerosis (n=159). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity vs. Carotid-radial and femoral-posterior tibial pulse wave velocity was evaluated on Coronary artery calcification (CAC) score (p=0.003). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity correlated positively with coronary artery calcification score (median 16.8 m/s for CAC >400 HU vs 13.8 m/s for CAC <10 HU; P=0.003), unlike other measurement sites.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: