Key result
NAFLD-only status linked to higher incident T2D risk, reaching a ~139% increase in women.
Why the study?
Some people fulfill criteria for NAFLD but not MAFLD, and whether individuals with NAFLD-only have an increased risk of type 2 diabetes remains unknown.
Does NAFLD-only status increase the risk of incident type 2 diabetes compared to individuals without fatty liver in a Korean population without baseline diabetes?
Cohort (n=246,424)
Does NAFLD-only status increase the risk of incident type 2 diabetes compared to individuals without fatty liver in a Korean population without baseline diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 2.39 (95% CI 1.63–3.51)
Individuals with NAFLD without metabolic dysregulation (NAFLD-only) are at an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to those without fatty liver, with a stronger association in women.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Re-classifying NAFLD as metabolic-associated fatty liver (MAFLD) has been proposed. While some people fulfil criteria for NAFLD, they do not have MAFLD; and whether NAFLD-only subjects have increased the risk of type 2 diabetes remains unknown. We compared risk of incident T2D in individuals with: (a) NAFLD-only; and (b) MAFLD, to individuals without fatty liver, considering effect modification by sex. METHODS: 246 424 Koreans without diabetes or a secondary cause of ultrasound-diagnosed hepatic steatosis were studied. Subjects were stratified into: (a) NAFLD-only status and (b) NAFLD that overlapped with MAFLD (MAFLD). Cox proportional hazards models with incident T2D as the outcome were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for: (a) and (b). Models were adjusted for time-dependent covariates, and effect modification by sex was analysed in subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 5439 participants had NAFLD-only status and 56 839 met MAFLD criteria. During a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 8402 incident cases of T2D occurred. Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for incident T2D comparing NAFLD-only and MAFLD to the reference (neither condition) were 2.39 (1.63-3.51) and 5.75 (5.17-6.36) (women), and 1.53 (1.25-1.88) and 2.60 (2.44-2.76) (men), respectively. The increased risk of T2D in the NAFLD-only group was higher in women than in men (p for interaction by sex <0.001) and consistently observed across all subgroups. Risk of T2D was increased in lean participants regardless of metabolic dysregulation (including prediabetes). CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD-only participants without metabolic dysregulation and the criteria for MAFLD are at increased risk of developing T2D. This association was consistently stronger in women than in men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n=246,424). NAFLD-only status vs. Individuals without fatty liver was evaluated on incident type 2 diabetes (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.63-3.51). NAFLD-only status increased the risk of incident type 2 diabetes compared to no fatty liver, with a stronger association in women (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.63-3.51) than men (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25-1.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: