Key result
Viral hepatitis in MAFLD+/NAFLD- T2DM patients is linked to ~75% higher mortality and advanced fibrosis.
Why the study?
There is limited evidence on the impact of changing the fatty liver disease definition from NAFLD to MAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Does the classification of MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-) compared to MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(+) predict higher risk of adverse outcomes in patients with T2DM?
Cohort (n=6,727)
Yes
Does the classification of MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-) compared to MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(+) predict higher risk of adverse outcomes in patients with T2DM?
Hazard Ratio: 1.75 (95% CI 1.29–2.4)
p-value: p=< 0.001
The shift from NAFLD to MAFLD criteria in T2DM patients identifies a subgroup (MAFLD+/NAFLD-) with significantly higher risks of cardiovascular events and mortality, suggesting the new definition captures a more heterogeneous and higher-risk population.
Supports fibrosis screening in T2DM; leaves open whether MAFLD criteria refine risk stratification versus NAFLD.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is comorbidity commonly presenting with fatty liver. A recently proposed definition of "metabolic associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD) is thought to replace non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Yet, despite the significant prevalence of T2DM among fatty liver, there remains limited evidence on the impact of the change in the definition of T2DM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study uses data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018. Survival analysis was conducted with a cox regression and sub-distribution hazard ratio for competing risk events. RESULTS: 6727 patients had a diagnosis of T2DM. 4982 individuals with T2DM had MAFLD and 2032 were MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-), while 2950 patients were MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(+). The new definition increased fatty liver diagnosis by 68.89%. Patients who were classified as MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-) were at a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, advanced fibrosis, all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality compared to MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(+). In MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-), viral hepatitis significantly increases the odds of advanced fibrosis (OR: 6.77, CI: 3.92 to 11.7, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.75, CI: 1.29 to 2.40, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The identification and treatment of NAFLD in patients with T2DM is a major concern and the premature change to MAFLD results in an over-diagnosis of fatty liver, exaggerated mortality, and morbidity in patients with T2DM. The definition of MAFLD causes further heterogeneity in fatty liver disease/NAFLD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muthiah et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Fatty Liver Disease (n=6,727). Viral hepatitis in MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-) patients vs. No viral hepatitis was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.40, p=< 0.001). In T2DM patients classified as MAFLD(+)/NAFLD(-), viral hepatitis significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.29-2.40; p<0.001) and advanced fibrosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: