Key result
Physical exertion or emotional stress as precipitating factors for coronary artery thrombosis remain debated, with conflicting literature on whether attacks follow effort or occur at rest.
The text reviews historical perspectives on whether physical exertion or emotional stress precipitates coronary artery thrombosis.
Conflicting literature leaves the precipitating role of exertion or stress unresolved; does not support changes in clinical recommendations.
During the past decade, knowledge of the clinical course of coronary artery thrombosis and the pathologic changes associated with it has been increased rapidly. Nevertheless, the actual events which precipitate an attack remain a matter of speculation. Characteristically, an attack of angina pectoris follows physical exertion or emotional stress, and without critical analysis the same factors have been considered responsible for inducing coronary artery thrombosis. Fitzhugh and Hamilton¹and others²expressed the belief that coronary thrombosis follows unusual exertion. Riesman and Harris³and Wolff and White⁴concurred with them but pointed out that an attack often occurs while the patient is at rest or even in bed. Other authors⁵found no definite relationship between physical stress and coronary thrombosis. Luten⁶went so far as to state that the attack invariably occurs in the absence of effort. Similarly, the importance of occupation and social status
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arthur M. Mastér (1937) conducted a review in Coronary artery thrombosis. Physical exertion or emotional stress was evaluated on Onset of coronary artery thrombosis. Physical exertion or emotional stress as precipitating factors for coronary artery thrombosis remain debated, with conflicting literature on whether attacks follow effort or occur at rest.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: