Key result
Wearing a facemask during meditative rest increases RMSSD ~16% vs no mask in young athletes.
Why the study?
During the COVID-19 mask mandate, the physiological repercussions of facemask-induced hypoxia and hypercapnia on heart rate variability at rest remained unclear.
Does wearing a facemask alter heart rate variability in young athletes at rest?
Does wearing a facemask alter heart rate variability in young athletes at rest?
Absolute Event Rate: 56.8% vs 48.9%
p-value: p=< 0.002
Wearing a facemask at rest alters heart rate variability in young athletes, indicating a physiological impact on autonomic balance.
Does not support changing mask practices in athletes; leaves open clinical significance of associated autonomic shifts.
During the imperative mandate of mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic, our study aimed to elucidate the physiological repercussions stemming from hypoxia and hypercapnia induced by facemasks during periods of rest. Specifically, we investigated the influence of facemasks on heart rate variability (HRV) within a cohort of young athletes. Experimental study in which 56 competitive adolescent athletes (55 % female) were evaluated. The heart rate data was recorded during 8-min, in meditative rest while seated. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of heart rate variability, examining both a 4-min segment and a 100-beat window. Comparisons were made between data recorded when subjects wore facemasks and when they breathed freely without masks. Data analysis was performed utilizing the Polar ProTrainer 5 software. The results showed relevant statistical differences at the level of cardiac variability (HRV): a) Heart Rate (mask: 70.5 ± 11.3 bpm vs no mask: 71.4 ± 12 bpm; p < 0.043. b) RMSSD (Mask: 56.8 ± 41.1 ms vs no mask: 48.9 ± 30.8 ms p < 0.002). c) RMSSD only 100 beats (mask: 58.1 ± 42.0 ms vs no mask: 46.7 ± 28.4 ms; p < 0.0001). Upon removing the facemask while maintaining meditative rest, 86 % of the subjects exhibited a distinct sympathetic response during the subsequent 5-min period. Notably, in 13 % of participants, this sympathetic response persisted across both phases of the study. Furthermore, the analysis of Ultra-Short-Term Cardiac Variability based on 100 beats accentuated the significance of the observed differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maura et al. (2025) studied this question. Facemask vs. No mask was evaluated on RMSSD (p=< 0.002). Wearing a facemask during meditative rest significantly increased RMSSD (56.8 vs 48.9 ms; p<0.002) and slightly decreased heart rate (70.5 vs 71.4 bpm; p<0.043) in young athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: