Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
November 12, 2002CirculationOpen Access

Lung Function and Cardiovascular Risk

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does low forced vital capacity increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction in healthy men, and is this mediated by inflammation?

Population

5,064 healthy men aged 28 to 61 years

Comparison

Low forced vital capacity (FVC) (fourth quartile) vs Higher forced vital capacity (FVC)

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

mean 18.4 years

Key result

Low forced vital capacity was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (RR 1.96; 95% CI 1.4-2.8), an excess risk that was partially explained by inflammation-sensitive proteins.

Authors

GEGunnar EngströmPLPeter LindBHBo Hedblad

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May inform CV risk stratification in men; leaves open causal mediation by inflammation and need for prospective confirmation.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=5,064)

Structured PICO

Does low forced vital capacity increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction in healthy men, and is this mediated by inflammation?

P
Population
5,064 healthy men aged 28 to 61 years followed for a mean of 18.4 years to assess the relationship between forced vital capacity, inflammation-sensitive plasma proteins, and cardiovascular risk.
E
Exposure
Low forced vital capacity (FVC) (fourth quartile)
C
Comparator
Higher forced vital capacity (FVC)
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and incidence of myocardial infarction over a mean follow-up period of 18.4 yearshard clinical

Main Result

Relative Risk: 1.96 (95% CI 1.4–2.8)

Low forced vital capacity is associated with increased cardiovascular risk in healthy men, which is partially, but not fully, explained by elevated inflammation-sensitive plasma proteins.

Cite This Study

Engström et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Healthy (n=5,064). Low forced vital capacity (fourth quartile) vs. Top quartile of FVC was evaluated on Cardiovascular death (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.4-2.8). Low forced vital capacity was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (RR 1.96; 95% CI 1.4-2.8), an excess risk that was partially explained by inflammation-sensitive proteins.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ffdc735281a23f90dbfd2https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000037220.00065.0d
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share