Key result
Implementation of a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) protocol for patients with MR-conditional CIEDs undergoing MRI decreased the cumulative risk priority number from 1190 to 492.
Why the study?
Exposing patients with CIEDs to MRI can cause adverse outcomes, prompting some radiology departments to decline referrals, creating a need to systematically identify and reduce risk in institutional CIED-MRI protocols.
Does failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) reduce risk in MRI protocols for patients with MR-conditional CIEDs?
Does failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) reduce risk in MRI protocols for patients with MR-conditional CIEDs?
Applying failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to CIED-MRI protocols significantly reduces procedural risk scores and facilitates safe scanning of patients with MR-conditional devices.
Supports FMEA adoption for CIED-MRI safety; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasing in prevalence. Exposing patients with CIEDs to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can lead to adverse outcomes. This has led certain radiology departments to not accept MRI referrals related to patients with CIEDs. Patients with MR-conditional CIEDs can be safely scanned under specific conditions. Our institution has accepted such referrals since 2014. The aim of this study was to systematically identify and reduce risk in our CIED-MRI protocol using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). METHODS: A multidisciplinary FMEA team was assembled and included senior stakeholders from the CIED-MRI protocol. A process map was constructed followed by risk analysis and scoring. Targeted interventions were formulated and implemented; high-risk failure modes were prioritized. A new process map and protocol were drafted and repeat risk analysis was performed. Monitoring and re-evaluation of the CIED-MRI pathway were instigated at departmental quality assurance (QA) meetings. RESULTS: Interventions included direct CIED characterization using wireless technology pre-MRI, CIED programming and reprogramming in the MRI suite before and immediately after MRI reducing device downtime and continuous patient monitoring during MRI by a cardiac physiologist. The cumulative risk priority number (RPN) decreased from 1190 pre-FMEA to 492 post-FMEA. DISCUSSION: Despite the risk of exposing CIEDs to the MR environment, patients with MR-conditional CIEDs can be safely scanned with an appropriate multidisciplinary support. We found FMEA an indispensable tool in identifying and minimizing risk with no adverse events recorded since FMEA recommendations were implemented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryan et al. (2020) studied Patients with MR-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) requiring MRI. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) protocol optimization vs. Pre-FMEA protocol was evaluated on Cumulative risk priority number (RPN). Implementation of a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) protocol for patients with MR-conditional CIEDs undergoing MRI decreased the cumulative risk priority number from 1190 to 492.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: