Key result
A 1-D arterial model accurately estimates central SBP within ~2.5 mmHg of reference values.
Why the study?
To introduce and evaluate a novel approach to estimate cardiac output and central systolic blood pressure noninvasively using peripheral cuff-pressure and carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity.
Does a 1-D arterial tree model adjusted with peripheral cuff-pressure and cf-PWV accurately estimate cardiac output and central systolic blood pressure?
Does a 1-D arterial tree model adjusted with peripheral cuff-pressure and cf-PWV accurately estimate cardiac output and central systolic blood pressure?
A 1-D arterial tree model can accurately estimate central aortic hemodynamics noninvasively using peripheral cuff-pressure and pulse wave velocity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports noninvasive central hemodynamic estimation in small cohorts; leaves open larger validation before clinical use.
GOAL: We introduce a novel approach to estimate cardiac output (CO) and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) from noninvasive measurements of peripheral cuff-pressure and carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV). METHODS: The adjustment of a previously validated one-dimensional arterial tree model is achieved via an optimization process. In the optimization loop, compliance and resistance of the generic arterial tree model as well as aortic flow are adjusted so that simulated brachial systolic and diastolic pressures and cf-PWV converge towards the measured brachial systolic and diastolic pressures and cf-PWV. The process is repeated until full convergence in terms of both brachial pressures and cf-PWV is reached. To assess the accuracy of the proposed framework, we implemented the algorithm on in vivo anonymized data from 20 subjects and compared the method-derived estimates of CO and cSBP to patient-specific measurements obtained with Mobil-O-Graph apparatus (central pressure) and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (aortic blood flow). RESULTS: Both CO and cSBP estimates were found to be in good agreement with the reference values achieving an RMSE of 0.36 L/min and 2.46 mmHg, respectively. Low biases were reported, namely -0.04 ± 0.36 L/min for CO predictions and -0.27 ± 2.51 mmHg for cSBP predictions. SIGNIFICANCE: Our one-dimensional model can be successfully "tuned" to partially patient-specific standards by using noninvasive, easily obtained peripheral measurement data. The in vivo evaluation demonstrated that this method can potentially be used to obtain central aortic hemodynamic parameters in a noninvasive and accurate way.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bikia et al. (2019) studied cardiovascular risk assessment (n=20). 1-D arterial tree model estimation using peripheral cuff-pressure and cf-PWV vs. Mobil-O-Graph and 2-D transthoracic echocardiography was evaluated on Accuracy of cardiac output (CO) and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) estimation (RMSE of 0.36 L/min for CO and 2.46 mmHg for cSBP). The 1-D arterial tree model accurately estimated cardiac output and central systolic blood pressure with an RMSE of 0.36 L/min and 2.46 mmHg, respectively, compared to reference measurements.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: