Key result
A machine learning model using 11 predictors demonstrated good discrimination (c-statistic 0.760) for identifying acute heart failure patients at high risk for non-home discharge.
Why the study?
Data on factors related to discharge disposition in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure were scarce.
Does a machine-learning-based prediction model using 11 clinical variables accurately predict non-home discharge or in-hospital death in patients admitted for acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=128,068)
Yes
Does a machine-learning-based prediction model using 11 clinical variables accurately predict non-home discharge or in-hospital death in patients admitted for acute heart failure?
Effect estimate: c-statistic 0.760 (95% CI 0.752-0.767)
A parsimonious 11-variable machine learning model can accurately predict the risk of non-home discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure, aiding in early care coordination.
May aid discharge planning in acute HF; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
BACKGROUND: Scarce data on factors related to discharge disposition in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) were available, and we sought to develop a parsimonious and simple predictive model for non-home discharge via machine learning. METHODS: This observational cohort study using a Japanese national database included 128,068 patients admitted from home for AHF between April 2014 and March 2018. The candidate predictors for non-home discharge were patient demographics, comorbidities, and treatment performed within 2 days after hospital admission. We used 80% of the population to develop a model using all 26 candidate variables and using the variable selected by 1 standard-error rule of Lasso regression, which enhances interpretability, and 20% to validate the predictive ability. RESULTS: We analyzed 128,068 patients, and 22,330 patients were not discharged to home; 7,879 underwent in-hospital death and 14,451 were transferred to other facilities. The machine-learning-based model consisted of 11 predictors, showing a discrimination ability comparable to that using all the 26 variables (c-statistic: 0.760 [95% confidence interval, 0.752-0.767] vs. 0.761 [95% confidence interval, 0.753-0.769]). The common 1SE-selected variables identified throughout all analyses were low scores in activities of daily living, advanced age, absence of hypertension, impaired consciousness, failure to initiate enteral alimentation within 2 days and low body weight. CONCLUSIONS: The developed machine learning model using 11 predictors had a good predictive ability to identify patients at high risk for non-home discharge. Our findings would contribute to the effective care coordination in this era when HF is rapidly increasing in prevalence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okada et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (n=128,068). 11-predictor machine learning model vs. 26-variable model was evaluated on Non-home discharge (transfer to other facilities or in-hospital death) (c-statistic 0.760, 95% CI 0.752-0.767). A machine learning model using 11 predictors demonstrated good discrimination (c-statistic 0.760) for identifying acute heart failure patients at high risk for non-home discharge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: