Key result
FT-CMR establishes healthy strain reference values, setting normal LV GLS at ~-18%.
Why the study?
What are the normal reference values for biventricular strain parameters assessed by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
No
What are the normal reference values for biventricular strain parameters assessed by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in healthy subjects?
This study provides gender-specific reference values for biventricular strain using feature tracking CMR, highlighting that women have higher global strain values than men.
Supplies FT-CMR biventricular strain references in healthy adults; extends normative data for research while clinical thresholds await prospective validation.
We derived reference values of left-ventricular (LV) and right-ventricular (RV) strain parameters in a cohort of 100 healthy subjects by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR). Global and regional strain values were calculated for the LV; circumferential and radialSAX strain parameters were derived from the short-axis (SAX) stack, while longitudinal and radialLAX strain parameters were assessed in three long-axis (LAX) views. Only global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated for the RV. Peak global LV circumferential strain was −16.7% ± 2.1%, LV radialSAX strain was 26.4% ± 5.1%, LV radialLAX strain was 31.1% ± 5.2%, LV GLS was −17.7% ± 1.9%, and RV GLS was −23.9% ± 4.1%. Women presented higher global LV and RV strain values than men; all strain values presented a weak relationship with body surface area, while there was no association with age or heart rate. A significant association was detected between all LV global strain measures and LV ejection fraction, while RV GLS was correlated to RV end-diastolic volume. The intra- and inter-operator reproducibility was good for all global strain measures. In the regional analysis, circumferential and radial strain values resulted higher at the apical level, while longitudinal strain values were higher at the basal level. The assessment of cardiac deformation by FT-CMR is feasible and reproducible and gender-specific reference values should be used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barison et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=100). Feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) was evaluated on Reference values of LV and RV global strain. Feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance established reference values for healthy subjects, including LV global longitudinal strain of -17.7% ± 1.9% and RV global longitudinal strain of -23.9% ± 4.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: