Why the study?
To evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of 2D and 3D CMR-TT for measuring LV global and segmental strain, and establish gender- and age-related reference values in healthy individuals.
Does 3D CMR-TT provide feasible and reproducible measurements of LV myocardial strain compared to 2D CMR-TT in healthy volunteers?
Does 3D CMR-TT provide feasible and reproducible measurements of LV myocardial strain compared to 2D CMR-TT in healthy volunteers?
Both 2D and 3D CMR-TT are feasible and reproducible for assessing LV myocardial deformation, with 3D CMR-TT offering better feasibility for segmental measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports 3D CMR-TT for segmental LV strain assessment in healthy volunteers; leaves open validation and clinical adoption in patients.
Qu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: