Key result
Hypercapnia with hypoxia slightly attenuates baroreflex sensitivity during postural changes compared to normocapnia.
Why the study?
Little is known about the combined influence of postural change and hypercapnia with hypoxia on dynamic baroreflex response, and classical stationary BRS assessment methods can be unreliable for nonstationary signals.
Does hypercapnia with hypoxia alter dynamic baroreflex sensitivity during postural changes in healthy volunteers?
Does hypercapnia with hypoxia alter dynamic baroreflex sensitivity during postural changes in healthy volunteers?
Time-frequency analysis of baroreflex sensitivity reveals that hypercapnia with hypoxia attenuates the cardiovascular response to rapid postural changes.
No immediate clinical implications for baroreflex monitoring; leaves open validation in patients with cardiopulmonary disease.
Baroreflex is a mechanism of short-term neural control responsible for maintaining stable levels of arterial blood pressure (ABP) in an ABP-heart rate negative feedback loop. Its function is assessed by baroreflex sensitivity (BRS)—a parameter which quantifies the relationship between changes in ABP and corresponding changes in heart rate (HR). The effect of postural change as well as the effect of changes in blood O 2 and CO 2 have been the focus of multiple previous studies on BRS. However, little is known about the influence of the combination of these two factors on dynamic baroreflex response. Furthermore, classical methods used for BRS assessment are based on the assumption of stationarity that may lead to unreliable results in the case of mostly nonstationary cardiovascular signals. Therefore, we aimed to investigate BRS during repeated transitions between squatting and standing in normal end-tidal CO 2 (EtCO 2 ) conditions (normocapnia) and conditions of progressively increasing EtCO 2 with a decreasing level of O 2 (hypercapnia with hypoxia) using joint time and frequency domain (TF) approach to BRS estimation that overcomes the limitation of classical methods. Noninvasive continuous measurements of ABP and EtCO 2 were conducted in a group of 40 healthy young volunteers. The time course of BRS was estimated from TF representations of pulse interval variability and systolic pressure variability, their coherence, and phase spectra. The relationship between time-variant BRS and indices of ABP and HR was analyzed during postural change in normocapnia and hypercapnia with hypoxia. In normocapnia, observed trends in all measures were in accordance with previous studies, supporting the validity of presented TF method. Similar but slightly attenuated response to postural change was observed in hypercapnia with hypoxia. Our results show the merits of the nonstationary methods as a tool to study the cardiovascular system during short-term hemodynamic changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazimierska et al. (2019) studied Healthy volunteers (n=40). Postural change (squat-stand maneuver) and hypercapnia with hypoxia vs. Postural change in normocapnia was evaluated on Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) during postural change. Time-frequency analysis demonstrated that hypercapnia with hypoxia slightly attenuated the baroreflex sensitivity response to postural changes compared to normocapnia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: