Randomized trial compares urinary and plasma iGFR methods in diabetic nephropathy, suggesting improved accuracy with urinary method.
Background: Isotopic glomerular filtration rate (iGFR) measurement is comparable to the inulin method. In this study, we compared urinary and plasma iGFR methodologies in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Methods: A total of 147 patients from 3 sites in the Diabetic Intervention with Vitamins to Improve Nephropathy (DIVINe) trial provided 213 sets of urine and blood collections, at baseline, 18 and 36 months. Results: The mean (with standard deviation) plasma iGFR of 60.7 (24.9) ml/min/1.73 m² compared to urinary iGFR of 52.0 (28.0) ml/min/1.73 m² was statistically significant (p value <0.001). Although plasma and urinary iGFRs were highly related (R² = 0.86), plasma iGFR increasingly overestimated urinary iGFRs at lower GFRs. In contrast to the cross-sectional analyses, the two measures of iGFR were weakly related (R² = 0.32) in regard to patients' change over 18 months of follow-up. Conclusion: Plasma iGFR may not be a suitable method for accurately measuring GFR in patients with advancing degrees of chronic kidney disease from diabetic nephropathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: