Key result
Higher epicardial fat volume fails to independently predict longer radiofrequency ablation duration.
Why the study?
The study aimed to determine the impact of epicardial fat volume on the duration of radiofrequency energy delivery during catheter ablation of AF.
Does epicardial fat volume impact the duration of radiofrequency energy delivery during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=222)
No
Does epicardial fat volume impact the duration of radiofrequency energy delivery during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: Beta 0.6
p-value: p=0.743
Epicardial fat volume is associated with longer radiofrequency delivery duration during AF ablation in univariate analysis, but acts as a marker rather than an independent factor of ablation complexity.
May not independently predict longer radiofrequency delivery in AF ablation; leaves open epicardial fat's role as a marker of procedural complexity.
AIMS: This study aimed to determine the impact of the volume of epicardial fat on the duration of radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery during the procedure of ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: The volume of epicardial fat was measured from spiral computerized tomography scan. The primary endpoint was the duration of RF delivery for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and the overall total duration of RF application. Secondary endpoint was conversion of AF to sinus rhythm or organisation of the arrhythmia after PVI. RESULTS: From March 2015 to May 2018, 222 patients (45.5% with persistent AF) underwent a first RF catheter ablation procedure for AF. The total duration of RF delivery, and the duration of RF delivery specifically for PVI were significantly associated with higher total volume of epicardial fat (p = 0.0002; p = 0.009 respectively), periatrial (p = 0.003; p = 0.045) and periventricular epicardial fat (p = 0.001; p = 0.012). In multivariate analysis, total epicardial fat volume was not significantly associated with total RF delivery duration (p = 0.743). For patients with arrhythmia at the time of the procedure, patients who achieved conversion or organisation of their arrhythmia after PVI had similar levels of total epicardial fat to those whose arrhythmia persisted (65 ± 35.2 vs 74.5 ± 31.2 ml; p = 0.192). CONCLUSION: We observed a significant relation between total, periatrial, and periventricular epicardial fat, and the duration of RF delivery during ablation of AF. This relation was not significant by multivariate analysis meaning that epicardial fat may be a marker, but not an independent factor, of ablation complexity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oudin et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=222). Epicardial fat volume vs. Lower epicardial fat volume was evaluated on Duration of radiofrequency energy delivery (total and for pulmonary vein isolation) (Beta 0.6, p=0.743). Higher total epicardial fat volume was significantly associated with longer total radiofrequency delivery duration in univariate analysis, but this relationship was not significant after multivariate adjustment (p=0.743).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: