Key result
Supervised concurrent training improves peak atrial longitudinal strain ~29% vs home exercise in HFmrEF.
Why the study?
Left atrial dysfunction is linked to exercise intolerance and poor prognosis in heart failure, but the effects of exercise training on atrial function in patients with HFmrEF are unknown.
Does supervised concurrent training improve left atrial function in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction?
RCT (n=70)
Single-blind (outcome assessor blinded)
1:1 basis to either a supervised combined training group (SCT) or a control (CON) group, random permuted blocks
No
Does supervised concurrent training improve left atrial function in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction?
Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 0%
p-value: p=0.008
Supervised concurrent training improves left atrial and ventricular function as well as exercise capacity in patients with HFmrEF.
Supervised concurrent training may enhance atrial function and capacity in HFmrEF; extends exercise benefits to left atrial strain in this population.
Left atrial dysfunction is associated with exercise intolerance and poor prognosis in heart failure (HF). The effects of exercise training on atrial function in patients with HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of a supervised concurrent training (SCT) program, lasting 12 weeks, on left atrial function of patients with HFmrEF. The study included 70 stable patients, who were randomly assigned into two groups: SCT with (three sessions/week) or a control (CON) group directed to follow contemporary exercise preventive guidelines at home. Before starting the training program and at 12 weeks, all patients performed an ergometric test, a 6 min walk test, and echocardiography. Between-group comparisons were made by analysis of variance (ANOVA). At 12 weeks, the duration of the ergometric test and distance walked at 6 min walk test presented a significant greater increase in SCT compared to the control (between-group p 0.0001 and p 0.004 respectively). Peak atrial longitudinal strain and conduit strain presented an increase of 29% and 34%, respectively, in the SCT, and were unchanged in CON (between-group p 0.008 and p 0.001, respectively). Peak atrial contraction strain increased by 21% in SCT, with no changes in CON (between-group p 0.002). Left ventricular global longitudinal strain increased significantly in SCT compared to control (between-groups p 0.03). In conclusions, SCT improved left atrial and left ventricular function in HFmrEF. Further studies are needed in order to verify whether these favourable effects of SCT on LA function are sustained and whether they will translate into clinical benefits for patients with HFmrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caminiti et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) (n=70). Supervised concurrent training (SCT) vs. Unsupervised home-based exercise was evaluated on Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) at 12 weeks (p=0.008). Supervised concurrent training increased peak atrial longitudinal strain by 29% compared to unsupervised home-based exercise in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: