Key result
Changes in systemic vascular resistance index during antihypertensive therapy did not correlate with changes in forearm (r=0.001, P=0.98) or coronary (r=0.13, P=0.39) minimum vascular resistance.
Why the study?
Do changes in blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance predict microvascular structure during treatment of mild essential hypertension?
Cohort (n=66)
Do changes in blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance predict microvascular structure during treatment of mild essential hypertension?
Effect estimate: r = 0.001
p-value: p=0.98
Changes in blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance do not predict changes in microvascular structure during antihypertensive therapy, suggesting direct measurements are needed to assess microvascular improvement.
Systemic vascular resistance changes may not track microvascular remodeling in treated hypertension; leaves open whether direct resistance vessel measurements are needed in future studies.
Background: Essential hypertension is characterized by small artery remodeling and increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR). We hypothesized that changes in SVR index (SVRI) were associated with measures of small artery structure as reflected by minimum coronary and forearm vascular resistance (C-Rmin and F-Rmin, respectively). Also, we investigated how F-Rmin is related to C-Rmin, coronary flow reserve (CFR), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and blood pressure (BP). Method: Sixty-six never-treated patients with uncomplicated mild essential hypertension had the following measured at baseline: 24-h blood BP, LVMI, CFR and C-Rmin (echocardiography), F-Rmin (forearm plethysmography) and SVRI determined by a gas re-breathing method. After 6 months of antihypertensive therapy administered by the general practitioner, the patients returned for follow-up measurements. Results: Changes in SVRI did not correlate to changes in F-Rmin (r = 0.001, P = 0.98) or C-Rmin (r = 0.13, P = 0.39) but did correlate to changes in CFR (r = 0.30, P = 0.04). Further analysis was performed by assigning the patients into two groups according to the median of drop in F-Rmin. When adjusted in a multivariate model, changes in F-Rmin (−8.1 ± 3.2%) were significantly associated with changes in C-Rmin (−9.3 ± 4.9%) and LVMI (−6.9 ± 1.7%) (P < 0.01), but not to either 24-h BP, SVRI or CFR. Conclusion: The results show that changes in neither BP nor SVRI reflected changes in minimum vascular resistance. However, changes in the forearm and coronary microcirculation occurred in parallel. Moreover, we demonstrated that neither BP nor SVRI reduction can predict changes in microvascular structure in hypertension. Thus, direct measurements of microvascular structure are needed to determine whether improvement is obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eftekhari et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in uncomplicated mild essential hypertension (n=66). Antihypertensive therapy was evaluated on Correlation between changes in SVRI and changes in F-Rmin (r = 0.001, p=0.98). Changes in systemic vascular resistance index during antihypertensive therapy did not correlate with changes in forearm (r=0.001, P=0.98) or coronary (r=0.13, P=0.39) minimum vascular resistance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: