Why the study?
Does spontaneous reperfusion before primary PCI improve immediate and long-term outcomes in diabetic patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease?
Does spontaneous reperfusion before primary PCI improve immediate and long-term outcomes in diabetic patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease?
Spontaneous reperfusion before primary PCI improves in-hospital survival in diabetic patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD, but this survival benefit is lost at 1 year.
May indicate transient in-hospital benefit in diabetic STEMI; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice pending randomized data.
BACKGROUND: The presence of normal thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) fl ow grade 3 before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with better outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of spontaneous reperfusion (SR) before PCI and its effect on the immediate and long-term outcomes in diabetic patients. METHODS: A total of 1,850 patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing primary PCI were enrolled and divided into 4 groups: (1) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and initial TIMI < 3 fl ow (n = 491), (2) patients with DM and initial TIMI 3 fl ow (n = 48), (3) patients without DM and with initial TIMI < 3 fl ow (n = 1,196), (4) patients without DM and with initial TIMI 3 fl ow (n = 115). RESULTS: SR before PCI was similar in diabetic and non-diabetic patients (8.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.8). DM was not an independent predictor of either pre-procedural or post-procedural TIMI 3 flow. In-hospital mortality rate was the highest in group 1 and the lowest in group 4 (p < 0.0001). Death rates of patients from groups 2 and 3 were similar (approximately 8.3% each, p = 0.9). Non-diabetic patients had a higher 1-year survival rate than diabetic patients, irrespective of their initial TIMI fl ow. CONCLUSIONS: SR is associated with a similar post-PCI improvement in epicardial blood flow both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. SR improves in-hospital survival of diabetic patients, which is similar to the survival of non-diabetic patients without SR. The benefi cial effect of SR in diabetic patients disappears during 1-year follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lekston et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: