Key result
Increasing gestational age between 24 and 28 weeks was associated with increased mean short term variation (P=0.05), accelerations (P<0.01), and time spent in high variation episodes (P=0.05).
Why the study?
How do computerised fetal heart rate parameters vary between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation?
Cross-Sectional (n=112)
No
How do computerised fetal heart rate parameters vary between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation?
p-value: p=0.05
In early gestation (24-28 weeks), the absence of accelerations or high variation episodes is not necessarily abnormal, and the standard 4 msecs threshold for short term variation remains valid.
Supports cautious CTG interpretation at 24-28 weeks; leaves open validation of gestation-specific norms in prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess computerised fetal heart rate recordings between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation for gestation related differences. DESIGN: Prospective, cross sectional observational study. SETTING: Liverpool Women's Hospital. POPULATION: 112 women: 28 at 27 weeks, 30 at 26 weeks, 27 at 25 weeks and 27 at 24 weeks of gestation, respectively. METHODS: Fetal heart recordings of 60 minutes duration were performed once in each pregnancy using the System 8000 fetal heart rate programme (System 8000, Oxford Sonicaid Ltd, Chichester, UK). For each gestational age, records were analysed for short term variation, basal heart rate, accelerations and time spent in high episodes. RESULTS: The mean short term variation increased with gestation (P = 0.05). No record had a short term variation <4 msecs. There was no relationship between heart rate and increasing gestation. The mean number of accelerations per record increased with increasing gestation (P < 0.01). 20% of recordings showed no accelerations > 15 bpm. The mean duration spent in episodes of high variation increased with gestation (P = 0.05). 13% of recordings showed no time spent in high episodes. All fetuses had normal outcomes at delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of episodes of high variation or absence of accelerations is not an abnormal finding at lower gestations. The standard threshold of 4 msecs for short term variation appears to remain valid at lower gestations. These differences should be considered when using computerised CTG analysis at early gestations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberts et al. (2001) conducted a cross-sectional in Pregnancy (24-28 weeks gestation) (n=112). Gestational age vs. Different gestational weeks (24 to 28 weeks) was evaluated on Short term variation (p=0.05). Increasing gestational age between 24 and 28 weeks was associated with increased mean short term variation (P=0.05), accelerations (P<0.01), and time spent in high variation episodes (P=0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: