Key result
Active standing elicited a significantly attenuated increase in forearm vascular resistance at 1 minute in healthy and impaired elderly subjects compared to young subjects.
Why the study?
Does the forearm vascular response to active standing differ between young, healthy old, and impaired elderly subjects?
Population
47 subjects including 18 healthy young, 10 healthy old, and 19 impaired elderly subjects
Comparison
Active standing (posture change) vs Comparison between young, healthy old, and…
Design
Cross-sectional
Follow-up
3 minutes
Authors
Loading...
Attenuated forearm vasoconstriction on standing may heighten orthostatic intolerance risk in elderly; leaves open causal contribution to falls, needing prospective confirmation.
Cross-Sectional (n=47)
Does the forearm vascular response to active standing differ between young, healthy old, and impaired elderly subjects?
The forearm vascular response to active standing is attenuated in many elderly subjects, which may impair adaptation to orthostatic stress.
Lipsitz et al. (1991) conducted a cross-sectional in Aging and vulnerability to orthostatic hypotension (n=47). Active standing vs. Young subjects was evaluated on Forearm vascular resistance change at 1 minute of standing. Active standing elicited a significantly attenuated increase in forearm vascular resistance at 1 minute in healthy and impaired elderly subjects compared to young subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: