Key result
An automatic method for identifying papillary muscles in 2-D echocardiographic images showed close agreement with an expert observer in 340 of 420 approximations.
Why the study?
Does an automatic method accurately identify papillary muscles in 2-D short-axis echocardiographic images compared to an expert observer?
Does an automatic method accurately identify papillary muscles in 2-D short-axis echocardiographic images compared to an expert observer?
An automated spatial and temporal processing method can reliably identify papillary muscles in 2-D short-axis echocardiograms, showing high agreement with expert observers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports automated echocardiographic analysis feasibility; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
An automatic method for identifying the location of the papillary muscles in two-dimensional (2-D) short-axis echocardiographic images is described. The technique uses both spatial and temporal information to identify the presence and track the location of the muscles in the left ventricle from end-diastole to end-systole. The three main steps of the method are spatial preprocessing, spatial processing, and temporal processing. The spatial preprocessing step includes a region of search estimation. The spatial processing step includes a papillary muscle existence test and an initial approximation of the papillary muscle points. The temporal processing includes motion-pattern evaluation and final papillary muscle location. The estimates of existence and position for the automatic method were compared with estimates made by an independent expert observer. Two hundred and ten frames, three taken from each of 70 image sequences, were evaluated. Since two regions of search were processed for each frame (one for the posterior-inferior and one for the anterior-lateral papillary muscle), a total of 420 approximations were made. Of this total, 340 automatic estimates were judged to be in close agreement with estimates made by the expert. Of the remaining 80 approximations, 54 estimates were made by the expert when the computer determined that no papillary muscle was present, 17 estimates provided poor results, and nine estimates were made by the computer when the observer concluded that no papillary muscle was present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karras et al. (1996) studied this question. Automatic method for identifying papillary muscles vs. Independent expert observer was evaluated on Agreement between automatic estimates and expert observer estimates of papillary muscle existence and position. An automatic method for identifying papillary muscles in 2-D echocardiographic images showed close agreement with an expert observer in 340 of 420 approximations.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: