Key result
Anodal tDCS fails to improve strength or balance over sham stimulation in motor rehabilitation.
Why the study?
Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with a motor relearning program improve strength and balance in sub-acute stroke patients?
RCT (n=44)
randomly assigned
Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with a motor relearning program improve strength and balance in sub-acute stroke patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not provide additional benefits for strength and balance recovery in subacute stroke patients undergoing a motor relearning program.
Background A stroke is characterized by neurological deficits that result in compromised muscle strength and balance, impacting the overall wellbeing of the patient, including decreased quality of life, socialization and participation in daily activities. The aim of the study is to determine the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with a motor relearning program on strength and balance in sub-acute stroke patients. Methods The randomized controlled trial involved 44 subacute stroke patients, randomly assigned to either the experimental group ( n = 22) or control group ( n = 22). The intervention included anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the experimental group and sham stimulation with a motor relearning program for the control groups. Assessments were conducted using manual muscle testing for muscle strength and the Berg Balance Scale for balance at baseline, the fourth week, and the eighth week. Results There were no statistically significant effects in the experimental group for either strength or balance ( p -value > 0.05) but there were time effects for both variables especially during the intervention period in both the experimental and control groups. Conclusion There does not appear to be any short term or long-term additional effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on strength and balance in subacute stroke patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haleem et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in subacute stroke (n=44). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with a motor relearning program vs. Sham stimulation with a motor relearning program was evaluated on Muscle strength and balance (p=>0.05). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with a motor relearning program did not significantly improve strength or balance compared to sham stimulation (p>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: