Why the study?
Older adult patients undergoing PCI are usually excluded from clinical trials, leaving 1-year clinical outcomes in patients aged >80 years poorly defined.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention using a thin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent increase the risk of target lesion failure in older adults (≥80 years) compared to younger adults (<80 years)?
Cohort (n=37,198)
Yes
Does percutaneous coronary intervention using a thin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent increase the risk of target lesion failure in older adults (≥80 years) compared to younger adults (<80 years)?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a large all-comer registry, PCI in patients aged ≥80 years using contemporary thin-strut sirolimus-eluting stents was associated with higher rates of target lesion failure and cardiac death compared to younger patients, but showed similarly low rates of repeat revascularization and stent thrombosis.
BackgroundOlder adult patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are usually excluded from clinical trials. This study aimed to assess 1-year clinical outcomes in patients aged >80 years.MethodsThis all-comer registry included patients who underwent PCI using the Ultimaster stent. Primary clinical endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death (CD), target vessel–related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR).ResultsIn total, 3286 (8.8%) patients aged ≥80 years were compared with 33,912 patients aged <80 years. The older adult patients included more women, had more comorbidities and exhibited more complex coronary anatomy. The incidence of TLF was higher in the older adult group (5.6% vs 3.0%, P < .0001), as well as for all-cause mortality (6.2% vs 1.7%, P < .0001), CD (3.3% vs 1.1%, P < .0001), and TV-MI (1.7% vs 0.8%, P < .0001), but not for CD-TLR (1.9% vs 1.7%, P = .15). After the inverse propensity score weighted analysis, aged ≥80 years was associated with increased risk of TLF (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.22-1.66; P < .0001), CD (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.136-2.06; P < .0001), and TV-MI (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.24-2.24; P < .001) but not for CD-TLR (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85-1.43; P = .45).ConclusionOlder adult patients had a higher incidence of TLF, CD, and TV-MI but with no difference in the incidence of recurrent revascularization or stent thrombosis. Although PCI in older adults is relatively safe, higher rates of cardiac events should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saada et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=37,198). Age ≥80 years vs. Age <80 years was evaluated on Target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death (CD), target vessel–related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.22-1.66, p=< .0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: