Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, a review is given of various goodness-of-fit measures that have been proposed for the binary choice model in the last two decades. The relative behaviour of several pseudo-R2 measures is analysed in a series of misspecified binary choice models, the misspecification being omitted variables or an included irrelevant variable. A comparison is made with the OLS-R2 of the underlying latent variable model and with the squared sample correlation coefficient of the true and predicted probabilities. Further, it is investigated how the values of the measures change with a changing frequency rate of successes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank Windmeijer (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: