Why the study?
Does ticagrelor improve coronary microvascular dysfunction measured by IMR in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to clopidogrel?
Does ticagrelor improve coronary microvascular dysfunction measured by IMR in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to clopidogrel?
This design and rationale paper outlines the protocol for the PLEIO trial, which aims to determine whether ticagrelor improves coronary microcirculation more effectively than clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Microvascular superiority of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in ACS-PCI remains unproven; PLEIO will deliver the first RCT data on IMR.
It has been previously demonstrated that ticagrelor can reduce mortality compared to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, the mechanism for this mortality reduction remains uncertain. The objective of the present study is to assess the impact of chronic ticagrelor treatment on microvascular circulation. A total of 120 participants aged 20-85 years with clinical diagnosis of ACS will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the following two groups: ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily; clopidogrel 75 mg once daily. To evaluate the status of microcirculation, the primary end point is coronary microvascular dysfunction measured using an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at 6 months after receiving the study agent. The purpose of this trial is to investigate whether ticagrelor, beyond its antiplatelet efficacy, could improve coronary microcirculation more effectively than clopidogrel for patients with ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: