Key result
Self-terminating ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome exhibited a longer mean cycle length and lower variability compared to shock-terminated fibrillation.
Why the study?
Do cycle length characteristics differentiate self-terminating ventricular fibrillation from shock-terminated ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome?
Observational (n=53)
Do cycle length characteristics differentiate self-terminating ventricular fibrillation from shock-terminated ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome?
Cycle length characteristics, specifically longer mean CL and lower CL variability, can differentiate self-terminating from shock-requiring ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome, potentially informing ICD detection algorithms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid differentiation of self-terminating from shock-terminated VF in Brugada syndrome; hypothesis-generating for ICD algorithm refinement.
AIMS: Limited information is available on self-terminating (ST) ventricular fibrillation (VF). Understanding spontaneous fluctuations in VF cycle length (CL) is required to identify arrhythmia that will stop before shock. Using Brugada syndrome (BS) as a model, the purpose of the study was to compare ST-VF and VF terminated by electrical shock and to look for spontaneous fluctuations in ventricular CL. METHODS AND RESULTS: Occurrence of ST-VF and VF was studied in 53 patients with 46 VF episodes: (i) spontaneously, (ii) during defibrillation threshold testing, (iii) during programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Fifteen presented ST-VF (average duration 25 s): 11 during PVS, 1 during defibrillation threshold testing, and 3 spontaneously (at device interrogation). Self-terminating ventricular fibrillation was compared with 31 VFs terminated by electrical shock. Mean ventricular CL was longer (192.5 ± 22 vs. 149 ± 19 ms) (P < 0.0001) and CL became longer or did not change in ST-VF (187 ± 28 vs. 200 ± 25 ms) (first vs. last CL)(NS) in contrast with progressively shorter CL in electrical shock-terminated VF (177 ± 14.5 vs. 139 ± 12 ms) (first vs. last CL before electrical shock) (P < 0.0001). Ventricular fibrillation had more CL variability (average 16.4 ± 6.5 ms) for the first 50 beats than ST-VF (average 4.08 ± 2) (P < 0.0001). Cycle length range for the first 50 beats was 9.6 ± 1 ms for ST-VF and 44 ± 15 for VF (P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: Self-terminating ventricular fibrillation in BS was not rare (28%). Ventricular CL was longer and progressively increased or did not change in ST-VF compared with electrical shock-terminating VF. Cycle length variability and CL range could differentiate VF and ST-VF within the first 50 beats. These parameters should be considered in the algorithms for VF detection and termination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cismaru et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Brugada syndrome (n=53). Self-terminating ventricular fibrillation vs. Electrical shock-terminated ventricular fibrillation was evaluated on Mean ventricular cycle length (p=< 0.0001). Self-terminating ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome exhibited a longer mean cycle length and lower variability compared to shock-terminated fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: